Woman admits to her making-up of rape story

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/england/hampshire/10595812.stm

Southampton woman admits making up rape story

A woman who claimed she was raped by a stranger who followed her into her Southampton home in broad daylight has admitted she fabricated the story.

She reported to police that a man got into her home in Wimpson Lane, Millbrook, and then threatened her and raped her on 2 February.

However, detectives who launched an investigation found her story did not add up.

The woman was given an official caution for perverting the course of justice.

After she reported the attack, which she said took place in the afternoon, extra police patrols were put in place in the area.

Det Sgt Steve Spencer, of Hampshire Police, said: "As a direct result of the thorough investigation we conducted it became clear that this reported rape had not occurred.

"The time spent investigating this incident should have been used on a genuine case.

"It is very disappointing that we had to waste our time and resources on this matter but at least the residents in the Wimpson Lane area can be reassured that the reported rapist does not exist."
.

Teenage girl makes false RAPE accusation

Another day another fake rape case!!!
Teenager girl alleges gang-rape against four, near a famous Mall in NOIDA. And, even though RAPE was ruled out in Medical Examination, she continued to claim she was gang-raped!!
The motive was simply to extort some money because of her financial needs.


And, here is the usual approach which police adopts when dealing with false cases.
Of course, the police lets go of the girl with "stern warning"!!
Only police can explain what they mean by their stern warning, and why in the first place did they not charge the girl with other offences??
Is she not guilty of cheating, wasting govt. servants time and public money for a false accusation??
If this had been done by a man, first action by police is to let their hands loose at brutal thrashing of the man. Next, they would have piled up sections from IPC/CrPC to teach him a lesson.


But, since, here they were dealing with a girl, they did not try to touch her with any of cheating cases.
What to expect next ??
This gal is having financial needs and wants to fulfill that with some quick, easy, extorted money. So, she is bound to return with better planning next time to make some false case again with some other unsuspecting 'bakra'

http://epaper.hindustantimes.com/ArticleText.aspx?article=20_06_2010_006_003&kword=&mode=1
New Delhi, 19 Jun 2010


The kidnapping and gang rape complaint made by an 18-year-old girl on Friday turned out to be false.

The police said the girl had planned to blackmail the four men she had accused of raping her. Though the police arrested the teenager, they let her off later with a “stern warning“.

“On Friday evening we received a call from the Delhi Police about kidnapping of a girl from Great India Place Mall area. Immediately police teams traced the Scorpio car and nabbed two suspected kidnappers and recovered the girl. The girl told the police that the two other men, who were with the accused, had run away,“ said R.N. Mishra, Deputy Superintendent of Police.

“The medical examination of the girl revealed no sign of injury at her private parts and no semen was found.
Though rape was ruled out in the medical examination, the girl continued to claim she was gangraped,“ said Mishra.

The girl had told the police that she had come for a job interview but the four men raped her in the car.

The DSP said, “The address given by her was found to be fake. Her sister came from Ghaziabad but she claimed she was her cousin. On detailed interrogation, she revealed her family was facing some financial problem and she was in need of Rs 50,000. She confessed that she made kidnapping and gang rape complaint to extract money.“

“She was handed over to her sister. Though she could have been booked for giving wrong complaint, she was let off with just a stern warning,“ said Mishra

False Rape filed to avoid traffic offenses

http://www.upi.com/Odd_News/2010/06/08/Rape-faked-to-avoid-traffic-offenses/UPI-48861276020347/
Rape faked to avoid traffic offenses

HARTSHILL, England, June 8 (UPI) -- A British woman admitted to inventing a story of a rape to avoid being charged with offenses related to crashing her boyfriend's car without insurance.

Sarah Hunter, 30, of Hartshill, England, pleaded guilty in Coventry Magistrates Court to wasteful employment of police time, using a vehicle without insurance and failing to stop after an accident, the Daily Mail reported Tuesday.

Prosecutors said Hunter took her boyfriend's car, which she was not insured to drive, without his permission and crashed into two parked cars in Canley. They said she ran to a nearby house and concocted a story of being dragged from the car by two men and raped in an alleyway.

Police said Hunter's story wasted 15 hours of their time and caused panic in the neighborhood, where residents believed rapists were at large.

Hunter faces up to six months in prison when she is sentenced later this month.

Live-in partners splits, woman files false criminal case against partner

Just how easy is it for women to exploit and abuse the Indian laws and judicial process has become evident once more in yet another false case!!
This lady entered into a live-in relationship while studying in UK. Subsequently, she delivers a baby in 2009 in UK.
Next, with intentions to extort from the guy, she files complaints against him with charges of domestic violence and rape while in UK itself.
It is very much evident that these were false complaints as these were filed about the 1 year after the birth of their child. But unlike Indian processes, the UK processes are lesser blind, and she had to herself withdraw all the allegations by signing an affidavit.


After some more time the couple returns India and go their separate ways. Now, this woman how much this woman is empowered in INDIA owing to the "Kannoon andha hota hai" (Law is blind) philosophy, and realizing she can extort good amount using (abusing) the Indian judicial processes, she goes ahead and files false criminal cases of IPC 498a, not one but two cases!!!


She wants money, uninterrupted and unquestioned custody of the child which is already with her and on top of that maintenance as well!!

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/-Live-in-couple-splits-Is-man-liable-to-pay-for-kids-upkeep/articleshow/5720076.cms
TNN, Mar 25, 2010


NEW DELHI: After throwing its weight behind live-in relationships saying there is no illegality if two adults live together, the Supreme Court is facing a difficult emotional fallout of it. 

What if two adults decide to live together in a foreign country, share an apartment and have a child and when they come back, the man goes away saying he had no formal relationship with the woman and hence was not liable to her and the child's maintenance? 

This question has cropped up before the Supreme Court, which has stayed proceedings initiated by a woman under Section 498A of Indian Penal Code in Gujarat. But realising the sensitivity of the issues involved, it posted the case for hearing on May 7. 

The case is between Japmandeep and Rajshri. He went to London on a student visa in March 2003 to do post-graduation in information technology from London College of Management and IT. There he met Rajshri, who was pursuing her masters in IT since October 2002. According to Japmandeep, "they became friends and in October 2003 started sharing the same apartment". 

"We shared an apartment in UK, but no religious ceremony for performing marriage took place in London nor did we register any civil partnership as is required under the law of UK. As per UK law, no relationship between the parties exist unless the formalities required under the law of UK are complied with," Japmandeep said in his petition before the SC seeking quashing of the proceedings initiated by his erstwhile live-in partner. 

But there was not a word by the man that a child was born to them in 2005 in UK. After staying the proceedings, the SC issued notice to Rajshri, who in her response submitted documents, including the birth certificate of the child from UK. 

The birth certificate showed that the child was born to Japmandeep Singh Ahluwalia and Rajshri Ahluwalia on November 9, 2005, at Wexham Park Hospital, Slough. A copy of the passport annexed to the reply filed in the SC through lawyer H A Raichura also gave identical description of the child's parents. 

To falsify Rajshri's claim that she was married to him, Japmandeep stated in his petition filed through counsel J S Chhabra that she on October 10, 2006, had made a complaint about domestic violence and rape against him to UK authorities. "However, on December 8, 2006, the complainant withdrew all the allegations levelled against him and signed a statutory declaration in the form of an affidavit before the oath commissioner in England that all the allegations regarding domestic violence, rape and dowry were false and untrue," Japmandeep said. 

But after they reached India on August 29, 2008, Rajshri left for her home in Gujarat and Japmandeep went to Patiala, where his parents lived. "All the communication which have taken place in the year 2008, between Rajshri and Department of Home Office, UK, she was addressed as Rajshri Ben Vijay Kumar Kesri and Japmandeep was addressed as her partner and not her husband," he said in his defence. 

Rajshri initiated proceedings under Section 498A at Patiala and Ahmedabad, and both have been stayed by higher courts — one by Punjab and Haryana HC and the other by SC. However, Rajshri in her response to the apex court expressed willingness to compromise with Japmandeep allowing him to contract fresh marriage provided he returns the money, ornaments and certificates he owed to her, the 4-year-old son remains with her and pays a lumpsum amount to her for maintenance. 

Woman files RAPE case to coerce live-in partner to marry her

Have a look at these news article:
1) http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Jet-Airways-co-pilot-held-on-charges-of-raping-air-hostess-/articleshow/5989439.cms


Woman, an air-hostess by profession, goes for live-in with her partner, a pilot, for 1 year. Both work for same airlines Jet Airways.
The relation does not work out for some or the other reason, and then she cries RAPE!!!

Varun Agrawal (27) was arrested from the domestic airport at suburban Vile Parle on charges of raping the 22-year-old air-hostess, who was in a live-in relationship with him, police added. 

He was booked under sections 376 (rape), 420 (cheating), 323 (punishment for voluntarily causing hurt) and 506 (punishment for criminal intimidation), they added.

This is a typical example of how a spate of false RAPE cases are filed in India. The accused is LABELED as GUILTY until proven innocent and the burden is on the accused to prove that he has not committed the crime.


Any sane person upon reading this news can easily make out that this is not a RAPE case but a consensual sex between two consenting adults.
Still, the morons in police not only register the case but also take the guy into custody!!!
Can here be any other motive than to extort money given that pilots are one of the highest earnings cadres in India ??


See again the role of media here. They openly shoot and air this poor chaps photos and videos on TV news channels and print.


2) http://www.hindustantimes.com/Police-should-be-extra-careful-in-this-case/Article1-550526.aspx


Even legal experts are of the opinion that this is not a case of rape, whether pretext of marriage or cheating.

Special public prosecutor Rohini Salian said the complainant is an adult mature enough to decide that she wants to live-in with the pilot. Even if it is assumed that she succumbed to physical relationship under threat, why did she keep quiet for so long, Salian asked. “The police could have conducted an initial inquiry before lodging the FIR,” Salian said. “The facts and circumstance of the case suggest that the pilot should not have been booked for rape.”

Public prosecutor Satish Borulkar agreed saying intercourse with the promise of marriage cannot be rape. “The Supreme Court held in 2009 that sexual intercourse following promise of marriage cannot be construed as rape,” Borulkar said. “The consent is there, even if with a false promise.”

Doesn't this case highlights that our police have scant regards for Supreme Court rulings??